Glamour Magazine displays model with a fat roll! Save for posterity!

lizzie-miller_the_woman-on_page194_glamourGiven that positive body image and media don’t often click these days, I don’t want to seem ungrateful for this fabulous shot of a normal looking woman in Glamour Magazine…

Dr. Robyn Silverman

Look.  I’m happy to see some more versatility in the media these days when it comes to shape and size.  When I was interviewed on this topic several years ago regarding the DOVE campaign and how I felt about it being in the top women’s magazines I said “well, it’s a start.  But the fact that there is one add that shows women in other sizes besides 2s and 0s, and a hundred that show that extra small is the only size, we have a long way to go.”

Now, I’m in the same boat.  I’ve been getting questions recently about how I feel about the new show “More to Love.”   On the one hand, I’m happy to see that a show featuring women who aren’t stick thin on primetime, but on the other hand, why is it all so segregated?  These women are still being shown to the “back of the bus” by saying “here, have a show, but you can’t be on the show with the thin women—you need your own show.” Do they have to drink from their own water fountain too? I know I’m not alone here.

I had a similar reaction to Glamour’s model, known as the “woman on p. 194,” who actually had a little pooch that stuck out over her underwear in September’s issue. Her name is actually Lizzi Miller, a 20 year old model , size 12-14, who is also an avid softball player and belly dancer.

People have gotten really excited—and Cindi Leive, editor of the magazine, was apparently shocked by the response.  She even wrote a post on the magazine’s website which talked about the vast number of letters she has been receiving since the magazine hit newsstands. She wrote:

The letters blew me away: “the most amazing photograph I’ve ever seen in any women’s magazine,” wrote one reader in Pavo, Georgia. From another in Somerset, Massachusetts: “This beautiful woman has a real stomach and did I even see a few stretch marks? This is how my belly looks after giving birth to my two amazing kids! This photo made me want to shout from the rooftops.” The emails were filled with such joy—joy at seeing a woman’s body with all the curves and quirks and rolls found in nature.

I’m thrilled to see something—anything—different than the one dimensional, one sized, one-shaped girl in the pages of a fashion magazine. I am.  And I don’t want to sound ungrateful here…or jaded…but…isn’t it sad that we get all worked up by a single picture sized 3in. X 3in. of “normal” among so many of “oh so thin?” (And she IS pretty normal—in fact, her BMI is 25.1—the medical “normal” range is 18.5-24.9 so it’s not like she is so “outside of the box!” And yet…she is!)

And isn’t it bizarre that the editor is SO surprised that we actually WANT to see different shapes and sizes when we open up a fashion magazine that is supposed to make us want to feel beautiful and…GLAMOURous?

Yes, people.  We actually DO like to see that women don’t need to be stick thin in order to be considered beautiful.  We like to see all different types of women because…well, then, there is more of a chance that many of us out here will see ourselves in those magazines and feel good about what we see in the mirror.  Girls and women need to see diversity in media. Not that one picture makes me say that we have hit the nail on the head—one picture IS NOT diversity.

But, it seems that Leive is not totally dense.  She wants to know what kinds of pictures people want to see—and assures us that it won’t fall on deaf ears.

“Trust me, Glamour‘s listening, and this only strengthens our commitment to celebrating all kinds of beauty.”

As our colleagues over at Jezebel relay to their reads;

Hopefully she means it, because it’s already obvious from the response to one three by three inch photo that women are interested in seeing beautiful pictures of women of all shapes and sizes that look like them, rather than what the magazine says they should aspire to look like. But, we’re still skeptical. If magazines run more images like the one on page 194, women may internalize the idea that you can look sexy with messy hair, no clothes or accessories, and a layer of body fat and stop buying products to fix their natural yet somehow “flawed” figures.

Yup.  And wouldn’t THAT be just sooooooooo terrible!!!

Dr. Robyn Silverman signature


6 Responses

  1. Absolutely wonderful and about time too!!! Finally, a picture portraying something more resembling of the TRUTH of MOST of us. Why do we hide behind all the “glam” and the make-up and the clothes and jewelry? Sure, it can serve as an artsy expression of individuality, but up to what point does this desire or socially taught norm to “cover up” and mask “flaws” not just as simple as our own Puritan-like shame of our born-beautiful bodies? What is wrong in our psychology that we seem to still see the body as something needed to “upgrade” or “fix”? Why can’t we love ourselves just the way we are? I mean, think about it! Even the so called “natural look” in make-up is a fallacy! Why do I have to put on make-up to look “natural”??? Oh, you mean, as if I was born without flaws? Well, I was. I was born the way I was supossed to look and it is my diversity added to the population of women what helps my sex be fun, beautiful and interesting, just as men also come in varied shapes and sizes and it’s absolutely wonderful because it means that theres something that fits EVERYONES varied tastes out there! Diversity and relativity makes this world beautiful. How can we still take that for granted and believe a load of whooey because some companies wish to get rich out of our insecurities and social opression? Pictures like these are one more step to reminding us of what was always true but we somehow forgot amidst all the confusing messages: “You are beautiful just the way you are and you are wonderful just because of the simple fact that you are YOU.” All my love and hope to the world, and thank you to the writers and photographers. You are truly helping women in chains liberate themselves from fear and open up to confidence and self-love, which is the basis of a happy, healthy individual. Now, don’t we all deserve this? ^.~V!

  2. Thank you for your insights Natalia– all girls and women deserve to feel beautiful just the way they are. Hopefully we will continue to see photos such as these grace the covers and pages of fashion magazines!

  3. I think its disgusting. What you are all promoting and celebrating is that to be beautiful and sexy, you have to be overweight, or underweight? Whats wrong with being a normal size? this model is overweight, at only 20 years she has a flabby gut, that is not attractive, its unhealthy. Same goes for size 0 models. Whats so wrong with normal? Everywhere i look in the media its bones and flab – whats wrong with muscle tone?

  4. I don’t remember how I came across your blog.
    I agree to the fact that woman doesn’t need to be stick thin or “measure up to the RIGHT dimensions”. I believe its more of the attitude and energy you carry in you. My girlfriend is far from the supposedly glamorous statistics but she her attitude is what I fell for!

    I have seen really goodlooking and glamorous girls who can’t even give a firm hand shake!

    What you feel about yourself is what others feel about you! Being someone of the right figure etc is just secondary I believe.

  5. […] Robyn: The concept of Love Your Body Day is straight forward– we should all love our bodies no matter what the shape or size! But what does LYBD mean to you and why celebrate it in such a big […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: